Legal Opinion

United States v. South Jersey Clothing Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil No. 96-3166 (JBS/AMD)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the pending motion for relief from this Court’s September 25, 2002 Consent Decree or alternatively to reopen the case and intervene by non-parties Richard Marolda, Sherry Marolda, Rigi Holdings, LLC and Marolda Farms, Inc. (hereinafter “Maroldas” or “Marolda Litigants”). [Docket Item 22.] Several insurance companies have intervened and filed opposition to the Maroldas’ motion. The government has also filed opposition.

The underlying action was filed by the United States against South Jersey Clothing Company (which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Tippins Incorporated v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API