Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Songer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 25, 1991No. 90SC643PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

We granted certiorari to review Songer v. Bowman, 804 P.2d 261 (Colo.App.1990). The issues before us are: 1) whether there is a time limitation under C.R.C.P. 59 for filing a motion to reconsider the trial court’s order granting a new trial and 2) whether the court of appeals erred by creating a claim for a doctor’s failure to warn of the risks involved in using a certain medicine. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the court of appeals’ decision. First, C.R.C.P. 59 does not apply to a motion to reconsider an order granting new trial because such an order is not a final order. Second, no…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Hamilton v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Chartier v. Winslow Crane Service CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Kelly Gallimore v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Bateman v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Breast Implant LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  2. Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. People v. RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. Gorab v. ZookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Morris v. Belfor USA Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API