Legal Opinion
Perini Corporation v. The City of New York (Pulaski Bridge)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 14, 1999No. Docket 98-7946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of New York (City) contracted with the Perini Corporation (Perini) to reconstruct the Pulaski Bridge. Soon after Perini commenced work in September 1991, the City ordered Perini to stop work because the necessary engineering and construction support services were not yet in place. Perini was directed to resume work in February 1992. In August 1995, Perini sued the City for delay damages caused by the City’s suspension of the work. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Louis L. Stanton, dismissed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Castaways Motel v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Comey v. . United Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hurlbut v. ChristianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Sassi v. Jersey Trucking Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Hauer Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herring v. Teradyne, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2002
- McKinley Associates, LLC v. McKesson HBOC, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Delidakis Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Delidakis Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006