Legal Opinion

Lustfield v. Ball

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Iron. (Stone, J.) Bill to declare a stay of execution null and void, etc. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

On March 21, 1893, Edward Sweeney recovered judgment in justice’s court against the Deer River Lumber Company. On March 27, 1893, defendant’s attorney filed with the justice the following paper:

“ Edward Sweeney, Complainant,

vs.

“Deer River Lumber Co., Defendant.

Before John Morrison, one of the Justices of the Peace in and for the County of Iron.

“County of Iron — ss.
“ Whereas, judgment was rendered in the above-entitled cause on the 21st day of March, 1893, by the above-named John Morrison, one of the justices of the peace in and for said county, in favor of Edward Sweeney, the above-named…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HopsonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. United States v. DashielSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. President of the Ontario Bank v. HallettNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Cooley v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Cummin's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Osceola v. Michigan Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sweeney v. LustfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API