Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
Plaintiff owns a lot of ground in the city of Shreveport, adjoining another belonging to defendants.
In 1914 both lots were vacant; and plaintiff, being first to build, placed one-half her wall on the adjoining lot, as she had a right -•to do. R. C. C. art. 675.
In 1919 defendants also built, using as one of their inclosures the wall erected by plaintiff in 1914.
I
Plaintiff, therefore, claim's of defendant one-half the value of said wall in 1919, say $3,784.06, relying on article 684, R. C. C., and on Augustin v. Farnsworth, 155 La. 1053, 99 So. 868.
Defendant admits that plaintiff is entitled to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Borde v. LazarusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Augustin v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Denegre v. MoranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Stubbs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Central Glass Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein & WienerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926