Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 22, 1925No. 26851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiff owns a lot of ground in the city of Shreveport, adjoining another belonging to defendants.

In 1914 both lots were vacant; and plaintiff, being first to build, placed one-half her wall on the adjoining lot, as she had a right -•to do. R. C. C. art. 675.

In 1919 defendants also built, using as one of their inclosures the wall erected by plaintiff in 1914.

I

Plaintiff, therefore, claim's of defendant one-half the value of said wall in 1919, say $3,784.06, relying on article 684, R. C. C., and on Augustin v. Farnsworth, 155 La. 1053, 99 So. 868.

Defendant admits that plaintiff is entitled to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borde v. LazarusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Augustin v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Denegre v. MoranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Stubbs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  5. Central Glass Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein & WienerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API