Hereford v. Warren
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GADOLA, District Judge.
This is habeas corpus action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which Petitioner challenges his state court conviction for armed robbery. On April 26, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen for a report and recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
Now before the Court are Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment 1 and the report and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hereford v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Abousamra v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Alger v. CorizonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Casey H. Perry v. Ryan SilverthonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Fluker v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.