Legal Opinion

Hereford v. Warren

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 30, 2007No. Civil Case 04-40293PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

GADOLA, District Judge.

This is habeas corpus action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which Petitioner challenges his state court conviction for armed robbery. On April 26, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen for a report and recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Now before the Court are Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment 1 and the report and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hereford v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Abousamra v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  3. Alger v. CorizonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Casey H. Perry v. Ryan SilverthonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  5. Fluker v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API