Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Boston Duck Tours, LP v. Super Duck Tours, LLC

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 18, 2008No. 07-2078, 07-2246Published

1Concurring in the judgmentDiclerico, District Judge

Although I agree that the preliminary injunction was erroneously issued and must be vacated, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s reasoning in reaching that conclusion. We agree on the basic standard for determining infringement, which requires proof that: (1) the asserted trademark is entitled to Lanham Act protection, and (2) “the allegedly infringing use is likely to result in consumer confusion.” Borinquen Biscuit, 443 F.3d at 116. We agree that “duck tours” is a commonly used phrase that means amphibious sightseeing excursions. We also agree that because “duck tours” is a commonly…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ty, Inc. v. The Jones Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. The International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Winship Green Nursing CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API