Ex Parte Snell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted Snell's petition for writ of certiorari in order to clarify an Alabama rule regarding hearsay; specifically, whether Alabama follows the common law; Federal Rule of Evidence 801; the Model Code of Evidence Rule 503(b); or Uniform Rule of Evidence 63(1). The facts pertinent to the issue before us are succinctly set out in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals as follows:
"The appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing impermissible hearsay testimony into evidence.
"On direct examination by the State, Detective David Kirkland testified that he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Edward SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Kolmetz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Duncan v. State.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Goodgame v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Snell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.