Cochran v. Hirsch Bros.

The record in this case shows that the plaintiff in error, defendant' below, as constable, levied upon a quantity of shoes in the store of Hirseh Brothers, plaintiffs below, to satisfy a claim of a third party against a defendant other than Hirseh Brothers; said Cochran,constable, claiming that said shoes were not the pioperty of Hirseh Brothers, but were the *35property of another person. Hirsch Brothers then got out a writ of replevin, and took the shoes from the possession of Cochran, the defendant below. A judgment was rendered in the justice’s court, in favor of Hirsch Brothers, plaintiffs…