Legal Opinion

Luxenberg v. Luxenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

On March 30, 1925, an order was entered in this separation action requiring defendant to pay, pendente lite, weekly alimony and a counsel fee. The action has never been tried nor has that order been vacated or modified. Defendant stands committed for contempt because he has failed to pay arrears thereunder amounting to upwards of $4,000. '

*514The record shows that during the year 1927 the parties ceased living apart and lived together for several months and the official referee has found that the reconciliation was in good faith, and that the subsequent alleged abandonment of plaintiff by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schatzberg v. SchatzbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Lawrence v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosen v. RosenNew York Family Court · 1956
  2. Seligman v. SeligmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API