Legal Opinion
State v. . Monger
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions
This was an indictment for selling liquor without license, tried before’ Boylcin, J., at the March Term, 1892, of Moore Superior Court. The facts are set out in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
MacRae, J.:
The defendant was tried and convicted before the Mayor of Sanford for violation of a town ordinance. From the judgment rendered against him he appealed to the Superior Court of Moore County, where, at March Term, 1892, before Boykin, Judge, and a jury, he was adjudged guilty upon a special verdict and fined. He appealed to this Court.
The special verdict was as follows:
“ That the defendant, on the first day of June, 1889,¡within the corporate limits of the town of Sanford, and within a quarter of a mile of the Methodist church in said town, did sell to J. W. Scott, Jr., spirituous…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Town of Washington v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Bunting v. . StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carolina Discount Corp. v. Landis Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Southern Ry. Co. v. McNeillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1907