ROGERS v. the STATE.

Coomer, Judge.

*163 Following a jury trial, Treston Dartrey Rogers was convicted of armed robbery. Rogers filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. Rogers appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for armed robbery and that the trial court erred in finding that he was properly advised of required Miranda 1 warnings prior to questioning. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

*400 1. Rogers contends that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to support his conviction for armed robbery. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, "[t]he…