Legal Opinion

Keystone Telephone Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 21, 1943No. 16636PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The libellant, Keystone Telephone Company, seeks to amend the libel under Rule 23 of the Supreme Court Admiralty Rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, by striking out the name Keystone Telephone Company from the title and substituting therefor the name Eastern Telephone & Telegraph Company.

The action is one to recover for damages sustained by certain submarine telephone cables damaged by the anchor of the vessel Cavalcade, owned by the respondent. It is alleged that through error and mistake the libel alleged that the owner of the cables was Keystone Telephone…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. The BeaconsfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Weldon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  4. The LydiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. The William F. McRaeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kilbourn v. Western Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. National Maritime Union of America v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. American Tobacco Company v. GoulandrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Industria E. Comercio De Minerios, S.A. And United States of America v. Nova Genuesis Societa Per Azioni Per L'IndustrIa Et Il Commercio MaritimoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Industria E. Comercio De Minerios, S.A. v. Nova Genuesis Societa Per Azioni Per L'industria Et Il Commercio MaritimoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API