Legal Opinion

Ball v. Winslow

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided September 25, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtLowell, J.

Counsel have argued the question whether interest should be allowed on the full amount of the decree below, which was made upon the report of the commissioner, which included interest. *48Waite,C, J., held, Deems v. Albany & Canal Line, 14 Blatchf. 474, that .{lie: decree in the circuit court should be made without compounding the interest on the damages, and without allowing it upon the costs., The practice has been uniform in this court, from a time whereof, etc., to give interest on the whole decree.

I agree, of course, that the decree here is a new decree, and not, technically speaking,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The" Wanata"Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Perkins v. FourniquetSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Hemmenway v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. The LucilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Deems v. Albany & Canal LineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steamship Wellesley Co. v. C. A. Hooper & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  2. New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  3. Cunard Steamship Co. v. CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  4. Arkansas Southern Railway Co. v. German National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API