Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1898No. 10650PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. Walter L. Simons, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

This was an action for damages for bodily injuries negligently inflicted by the plaintiff in error, upon the line of the Fort Scott, Southeastern & Memphis Railway, many years ago. The facts were presented to the court below in an agreed statement, and in other documentary forms. Summarized, they are that the Fort Scott, Southeastern & Memphis Railway Company and the Missouri River, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad Company were Kansas corporations, and the first named company leased its line to the one last named, under the following instrument:

“ This Agreement, Made this ninth day of December, a.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. St. Louis, Wichita & Western Railway Co. v. CurlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Heron v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCabe's Admx. v. Maysville & B. S. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Breeden's Adm'x.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Hamilton v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Estes v. Memphis & C. Ry. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Sinkhorn v. Lexington, H. & P. Turnpike Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API