Legal Opinion

Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1975No. Civ. A. 71-166PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KNOX, District Judge.

In this civil action the-court must determine the validity of United States Letters Patent No. 2,932,509, “Body Exercising Apparatus”, issued to Harold Zinkin on April 12, 1960. This action is but a part of a larger litigation among these parties. Their lawsuits in this court involve questions of copyright infringement, unfair competition, patent infringement, patent misuse, and antitrust violations. 1 The path of this litigation has been filled with detours: a motion to disqualify counsel, a motion for civil contempt, and of course, lengthy discovery with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. John Wright, Inc. v. Casper Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Toro Co. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  4. Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Mirror Polishing & Plating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  5. Sims v. MacK Truck Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API