Legal Opinion
United States v. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1996No. 95-3121PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
The district court resentenced the appellant Calvin Moore pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 after his original counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal. Upon resentenc-ing, the district court effectively ruled that its jurisdiction limited it to imposition of the original sentence, precluded rehearing of previously considered arguments and motions, and barred consideration of new arguments and new evidence. The district court’s jurisdiction, however, is not so limited and this court remands to the district court for further proceedings.
I
Appellant Calvin Moore was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. George Robert BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- ARW Exploration Corp. v. AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael A. WhrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. TicchiarelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.