Wiener v. Wiener
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
Prior to the adoption of the new Rules of the Superior Court, it was the practice that where the defense to a divorce action was to consist of no more than a general denial of the allegations of the petition, no answer need be filed. Otherwise, a formal answer was required. 2 Wooley, Delaware Practice, Sec. 1636; Banks v. Banks, 6 Penn. 442, 67 A. 835; Bancroft v. Bancroft, 4 Boyce 9, 85 A. 561; Palese v. Palese, 6 Boyce 584, 101 A. 438. In our opinion, Rule; 104 has changed this practice and requires the filing of an answer in every case where…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bancroft v. BancroftSuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
- Palese v. PaleseSuperior Court of Delaware · 1917
- Perkins v. BringhurstSuperior Court of Delaware · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Street v. StreetSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953