Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Luscher

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1922No. Civ. No. 3866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an action to recover on a bail bond executed by defendant to secure the appearance of one Ray J. Ford in court in response to a felony charge. Ford did not appear at the time set for his trial and the court thereupon made its order declaring the bond forfeited. Judgment herein went for plaintiff against both defendants, jointly and severally, for the amount of the bond, which was $1,000. Defendant Luscher appeals.

The first point made by appellant is that the complaint fails to state a cause of action because it is barren of allegation that Ford was ever notified of the time and place…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Deangeles v. CottaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. State v. GossUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Forbes v. Board of Missions of Methodist Episcopal ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. DeletorreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API