Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Brooks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 1999-0919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings of the board in the Jackson matter. In cases where a contract for legal services in a tort matter includes a contingent fee, R.C. 4705.15(B) requires that “[the] agreement shall be reduced to writing.” Columbus Bar Assn. v. Klos (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 486, 490, 692 N.E.2d 565, 568. In addition to outlining the percentage that the attorney will charge for fees, the agreement should provide that the client is liable for the costs of litigation. Cf. Disciplinary Counsel v. Shane (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 494, 497, 692 N.E.2d 571, 573-574. Examples of such costs appear in DR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. KlosOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API