Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from McPherson District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

*501The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

Prior to August 16, 1887, the firm of Watson & McCormick had been engaged in a general hardware and agricultural implement business in Marquette, McPherson county, in this state. To secure indebtedness, they executed chattel mortgages upon their stock in trade as follows, to wit: (1) Bank of Marquette, $470; (2) Baker Wire Company, $1,988; (3) Smoky Valley Bank, $1,054; (4) Wyeth Hardware Company, $402; (5) Townley Metal Company, $329.60. These mortgages were executed in the order recited, and the amounts purporting to be secured by these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frankhouser v. EllettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Leavenworth, Lawrence & Galveston Rld. v. Comm'rs of Douglas CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Randall v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Noyes v. RossMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Vermillion v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. West Coast Grocery Co. v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Joyce v. Armourdale State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API