Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Orange County Department of Education v. California Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2011No. 09-56192Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBybee, Circuit Judge
We are asked to identify the agency financially responsible for the education of A.S., a minor, from July 28, 2006 through April 19, 2009. I agree with the majority that for the period of July 28, 2006 to October 9, 2007, the California Department of Education (“CDE”) is responsible for A.S.’s education, although the majority and I reach that conclusion in different ways. See Maj. Op. at 1053-54. I also conclude that CDE is responsible for A.S.’s education from October 10, 2007 to December 31, 2008, and therefore disagree with the majority’s contrary conclusion. Id. at 1053-54. And for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.