Legal Opinion
Richard Anthony Hoots v. Harry Allsbrook Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Rufus L. Edmisten
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1986No. 84-6724Published
1Opinion of the Court
785 F.2d 1214
Richard Anthony HOOTS, Appellant,
v.
Harry ALLSBROOK; Attorney General of the State of North
Carolina, Rufus L. Edmisten, Appellees.
No. 84-6724.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 10, 1985.
Decided March 5, 1986.
Robert S. Boyan (Boyan, Nix & Boyan, High Point, N.C., on brief), for appellant.
Barry S. McNeill, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
1
Richard Hoots was convicted by a jury of armed robbery, and sentenced by a North Carolina state…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. HamletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Richard Anthony Hoots v. Harry Allsbrook Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Rufus L. EdmistenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Tillman Randolph CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.