Legal Opinion

John Thomas Fitts v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1967No. 9176_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, John Thomas Fitts, was-on February 7, 1964, convicted by a jury in the District of Kansas of violating the Dyer Act. On March 16, 1964, he was. sentenced to serve four years with the sentence to run concurrently with a sentence previously imposed in another district. This court has affirmed the conviction (Fitts v. United States, 335 F.2d 1021, cert. denied 379 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 682, 13 L.Ed.2d 569). Fitts next filed motion to vacate sentence and/or petition for writ of habeas corpus which was denied and such denial affirmed by this, court. (Fitts v. Willingham, 359 F.2d 790).

I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John Thomas Fitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. John Thomas Fitts v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States of America, Appellee-Plaintiff v. Lorenzo Hubbard, Appellant-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. James H. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Bernard Vincent MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Bernard Vincent MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API