Farnsworth v. Wee

CLARK, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from the order of the trial court sustaining the motion of respondents to dismiss appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. Among the grounds recited by the trial court as a basis to dismiss the petition was the conclusion that mandamus was inappropriate in this case because appellant did not seek by the court’s writ to enforce any established right. We agree and therefore affirm the judgment.

Taking the allegations of appellant’s first amended petition to be true, the facts of the case are as follow. In June and July, 1984, the Kansas City, Missouri…