Legal Opinion
State Bank of Omaha v. Means
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 20, 1988No. 9563PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
The State Bank of Omaha sued the City of Mount Pleasant for damages resulting from the city’s demolition of two portable buildings on which the bank had a lien. A jury found that the buildings constituted a nuisance, and that their value was $14,000.00. The trial court refused to allow the bank a recovery and entered a take-nothing judgment. The bank appeals, arguing that it should have recovered the $14,000.00, which the jury found to be the market value of the buildings, and that the city’s ordinance which authorized the demolition of the buildings is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Texarkana v. ReaganTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- South Texas Coaches, Inc. v. EastlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trans-State Pavers, Inc. v. Haynes, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- City of Dallas v. Heather StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Dallas v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.