Legal Opinion

McKellar Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Paxton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1923No. 3973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

This action seeks to recover an amount alleged to be due plaintiffs upon a written contract for the sale of real property. The parties to the contract are the defendants Paxton and wife, as purchasers, and plaintiffs W. R. Walker and wife and Alvin M. Jensen and wife, as sellers. The contract is dated April 27, 1920. Prior to the trial of the case, plaintiff Walker had by purchase, acquired the interests of the other parties plaintiff in the real property covered by the contract.

The written contract provides:

“That the sellers have sold, and do hereby agree to convey or cause to he conveyed,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taft v. KesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  2. McCourt v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Harvey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Wickman v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Tremonton Inv. Co. v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Frailey v. McGarryUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Taylor v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McBride v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Paxton v. Paxton, Walker Et Ux. v. SameUtah Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API