Rice v. Stanley
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentPaul W. Brown, J.
In my view, the language of the wills involved herein is totally defective. It requires the trustee to hold the estate until the building of a special hospital by someone in such a way as to satisfy the criteria contained in the wills. Distribution to charity is conditioned upon this event. The wills do not provide for any other distribution.
*227No perpetuities cases, such as this one, involving gifts for charitable purposes that are conditioned upon the occurrence of events that might occur, if at all, at a time beyond the period of the rule against perpetuities, can be found in Ohio. But a fact…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Trustees of New Castle Common v. MegginsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1910
- Craft, Exrx. v. ShroyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Jocelyn v. NottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Brooks v. City of BelfastSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.