Legal Opinion

David Macall v. First Montgomery Group, et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 23, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00557Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE DAVID MACALL, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 24-557 (CPO/EAP) FIRST MONTGOMERY GROUP, et al., Defendants. OPINION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff David Macall’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 70 (Third Motion to Amend the Complaint (“Pl.’s Mot.”)). The following Defendants have opposed the Motion: (1) Defendants FB Riverside Owner LLC, FB Riverside JV LLC, and Vertical Realty Capital LLC (collectively, the “FB Defendants”), ECF No. 80 (FB Defs.’ Opp.); (2) Defendant Hunter…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Estate of Adriano Roman, Jr. v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  3. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API