Gamble v. Warner

From tne record in this case, it appears that the original action was assumpsit. The summons was issued against Samuel Gamble and two other defendants, and judgment was rendered against them all by default.

The error assigned in the court below presented the simple question whether or not all the defendants are duly served with process.

The indorsement of service upon the back of the writ is in these words:

“November 10, 1846. Served by leaving a copy'of this writ at the residence of the within-named defendant.

“ M. H. Alkire, Sheriff.

“Service, 35 cents; mileage, 75 cents; copy, 20 cents. Total,…