Teague v. Irwin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Colt J.
The plaintiff, in the first count of his amended declaration, which is in tort, alleges that he bought stock in the Winthrop & Point Shirley Railroad Company of the defendant, who was then president of that corporation, upon false and fraudulent representations by the latter that the company was solvent; that its capital stock had all been paid in; that it was able to lay its track and provide rolling stock and pay all bills contracted; and that its stock was not for sale, and the plaintiff could not buy it anywhere but of him. There were "other representations alleged to have been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Milliken v. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Morse v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Homer v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
3Cited by11 opinions
- Deming v. DarlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Andrews v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- American National Bank v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Handy v. WaldronSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894
- Rodee v. SeamanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.