Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1987No. 69490Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

A bare majority would have this Court bestow upon courts of appeals jurisdiction, power and authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters, and then test propriety of their exercise of the grant by a standard developed on the civil side out of considerations inapposite to criminal law. I dissent to the doing in this cause because Relator is deceased, and to what is ultimately done because erroneous in both aspects.

Mandamus Jurisdiction

When we distill Part III. B. of the majority opinion its essence is deceptively simple: “The word ‘all’ [in former article 1824, Y.A. C.S., and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Curry v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API