Legal Opinion

Crane v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 71718Published

Following Provident Trust Co. of Philadelphia, Executor, of Estate of Owen Osborne,29 B.T.A. 374, held, that upon transmission of installment obligations, occasioned by the death of the owner, gain arises under section 44(d) of the Revenue Act of 1928; held, further, that such gain is a capital gain, the property sold having been a capital asset.

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER M. CRANE AND CAROLINE E. CRANE, EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER B. CRANE, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Crane v. Commissioner

Docket No. 71718.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

30 B.T.A. 29; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1390;

March 6, 1934, Promulgated

Following Provident Trust Co. of Philadelphia, Executor, of Estate of Owen Osborne,29 B.T.A. 374, held, that upon transmission of installment obligations, occasioned by the death of the owner, gain arises under section 44(d) of the Revenue Act of 1928; held, further, that such gain is a capital gain, the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Provident Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  2. Crane v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API