Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
This case comes here on an appeal by the defendant from an order denying its motion for judgment or a new trial.
The plaintiff was injured while working for the city of Minneapolis in removing the block pavement from Nicollet avenue between Twenty-sixth and Twenty-seventh streets south in that city. He recovered a verdict for $6,788.75. The principal questions presented by this appeal are whether or not the evidence supports the jury’s findings of negligence on the part of the defendant, and whether or not as a matter of law the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- McGuigan v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Carlson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Hafner v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schuman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Hoelmer v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940