Legal Opinion

Mullins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1982No. CR 82-61PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Mullins was charged with having sold “a quantity of controlled substance, to-wit: 100 quaalude tablets containing methaqualone, a Schedule II controlled substance,” to an undercover police officer. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, with a 30-year sentence. The only argument for reversal is that the cpurt should not have admitted into evidence the 90 whole tablets and 10 half tablets that remained after the other 10 half tablets had been tested by a chemist at the State Crime Laboratory.

The chemist testified that she received 100 white tablets each monogrammed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abbott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Rhoades v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MinottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. State v. RodrigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. PerezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Crossno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API