Legal Opinion

Woert v. Olmstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1901Published

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS FLANNAGAN, Referee.

This is an action for an accounting. The subject of the action is primarily a fund in the hands of the defendants Thompson & Mairs, which arose in the following manner: The defendants Olmstead & Taylor were stockbrokers, and the plaintiff and the defendants Pike, Comstock, Franklin & Seamans, and defendant Weeks’ assignor were customers of that Arm. The plaintiff and these customers" had on deposit with Olmstead & Taylor certain stocks, which Olmstead & Taylor held as collateral security for various sums due on their several accounts. Olmstead & Taylor intermingled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Le Marchant v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Smith v. . SavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Douglas v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Whitlock v. Seaboard National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rhinelander v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API