Woert v. Olmstead
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS FLANNAGAN, Referee.
This is an action for an accounting. The subject of the action is primarily a fund in the hands of the defendants Thompson & Mairs, which arose in the following manner: The defendants Olmstead & Taylor were stockbrokers, and the plaintiff and the defendants Pike, Comstock, Franklin & Seamans, and defendant Weeks’ assignor were customers of that Arm. The plaintiff and these customers" had on deposit with Olmstead & Taylor certain stocks, which Olmstead & Taylor held as collateral security for various sums due on their several accounts. Olmstead & Taylor intermingled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Le Marchant v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Smith v. . SavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Douglas v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Whitlock v. Seaboard National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- Rhinelander v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.