Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Simmons Group, Ltd. v. Caine O'Rear, Jr. Family Trust

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 2017No. 1150475Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partParker, Justice

' I concur in the result insofar as the majority reverses the circuit court’s judgment in favor of the O’Rear defendants.

I dissent in part because I believe that the main opinion unnecessarily limits a trial court’s discretion in considering relevant evidence in a property dispute when it is presented with the situation, as in this case, where competing chains of title cannot be traced to a common grantor or to a patent deed from the United States as a result of the destruction of the relevant land records. I agree that the rule from Whitehead v. Hester, 512 So.2d 1297 (Ala. 1987), applies in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Whitehead v. HesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Chancy v. Chancy Lake Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Williams v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API