Crissy v. Vogt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 155, Oct. T., 1898, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Pbila. Co., Sept. T., 1897, No. 138, in favor of defendant non obstante veredicto. Assumpsit.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 155, Oct. T., 1898, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Pbila. Co., Sept. T., 1897, No. 138, in favor of defendant non obstante veredicto. Assumpsit. Before Biddle, P. J. It appears from the record and evidence that the plaintiff recovered judgment against one Charles Godel in an action of trespass and that defendant, Godel, did petition the court helow for the benefit of the provisions of the act of June 16,1836, P. L. 729, for insolvent debtors, and did execute and deliver to William Crissy, the plaintiff, the following bond, signed and sealed by Frederick Gustav Vogt: “…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
William W. Porter, J.,
The bond sued on contains the condition prescribed by the act of 1836. It is “ that said debtor shall appear at the next term of the court of common pleas of the said county, and then and there present his petition for the benefit of the insolvent laws of this commonwealth, and comply with all the requisitions of the said law,” etc.
The next term of the court of common pleas, after the delivery of the bond, ended on September 20, 1897. The debtor filed his petition September 16, 1897. The next entry on the record is October 23,1897, “ the defendant appearing,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greenwaldt v. KrausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Fritts v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Donnell v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899