Kirby v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Under sections 7705 and 7707 of the Code, the trial court properly allowed the introduction in evidence of the several collateral signatures of the alleged grantor, Brooks, and of the notary public, Windham, which witnesses testified were genuine.
In order to be allowed to compare the proven signature with the one whose genuineness is challenged, the witness must either be an expert, or he must be familiar with the author’s handwriting. Code, §§ 7705, 7707; Brown v. Welch, 209 Ala. 518, 96 So. 610.
As to the witnesses Woodham and Woodall, no objection was made as to their want of qualification,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Burnwell Coal Co. v. SetzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Kirksey v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Tullis v. KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Ware v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Kay-Noojin Development Co. v. KinzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Glaze v. TennysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.