Legal Opinion

State v. Hilton

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 8, 2013No. Nos. 102,256, 102,257PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Heather Hilton was put on probation in two separate felony cases, and the district court followed the parties’ agreement by making the two probations—each lasting 12 months—consecutive to one another. A month later, Hilton violated one of the conditions of her probation.

The State asked that probation be revoked in both cases and that Hilton be required to serve the prison sentences for both crimes. Hilton argued that since the probation terms were made consecutive to one another she was only serving the first probation at the time of the violation. As a result, she argued, the court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. James David RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. WendowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. HiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. ConnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API