Legal Opinion
863 To Go, Inc. v. Department of Labor
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 13, 2014No. 2013-413PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.
¶ 1. The single issue in this appeal is whether payments by employer 863 To Go, Inc. to its delivery drivers should be excluded from the calculation of employer’s contribution to Vermont’s system of unemployment compensation. We affirm the decision of the Vermont Employment Security Board requiring employer to include these payments in the calculation of its unemployment contribution.
¶ 2. Employer is a Vermont corporation which provides food delivery services to Burlington-area restaurants that do not employ drivers of their own. The company commenced operations in 2005. Its business model…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Bouchard v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Fleece on Earth v. Dept. of Employment and TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Blue v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Smoky Mountain Secrets, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Great Northern Construction, Inc. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Juanita Burch-Clay v. Debra J. Taylor, Individually and In Her Capacity as Superintendent of Schools, Rutland Central Supervisory UnionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Lionel Beasley v. Department of Labor (Champlain College, Inc., Employer)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Louis F. LaFountain v. Department of Labor (Eden General Store, Inc., Employer)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.