Legal Opinion

Estate of Larkin

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1966No. L. A. 27652; L. A. 27653PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

The present eases, consolidated for appeal, require us to construe and apply section 259 of the Probate Code which restricts the freedom of Californians to leave their property to nonresident aliens. That statute makes the validity of such gifts conditional upon the existence of reciprocal rights, on the part of United States citizens, to share without discrimination in estates governed by the law of the foreign beneficiary’s own country.

The beneficiaries in the present eases are citizens and residents of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.). In both cases the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Irving Trust Co. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. United States v. KnutzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Estate of Simmons v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Zschernig v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re the Estate of MillersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Siofletea v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Estate of ChicherneaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API