Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Sklar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1928No. 18222Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Osage county, wherein the defendant in error was plaintiff.

Plaintiff in error in due time served and filed her brief in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or otherwise appear in this court upon the merits of the case, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so.

‘‘Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. CoatneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Ahfonoke v. BullettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Harbour-Longmire Furn. Co. v. Kennedy Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API