Legal Opinion
James v. Rini v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 1968No. 16963_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Rini appeals from the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, after a hearing was held on remand in accordance with this court’s decision in Rini v. Katzenbach, 374 F.2d 836 (7th Cir. 1967). The purpose of the hearing on remand was to ascertain whether or not Rini was advised of his right to counsel and whether he knowingly waived that right. Id. at 839.
The facts, as developed by the hearing on remand, are more complete than those originally before this court. Rini was suspected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of being a participant in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Robert William Losieau v. Maurice H. Sigler, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- The People v. HessenauerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- United States v. Rosivito HoskinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- State v. PaulNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.