State v. Harrell / Wilson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLinder, J.
I agree with the majority’s essential legal analysis in these cases, which recognizes that a trial judge’s decision whether to consent to a jury waiver in a criminal case may be based on an array of considerations, including the interests of the state, as articulated by the prosecutor. I further agree that the trial judge may not simply defer to the position of the prosecutor in a way that delegates the decision whether
*267to consent to the prosecutor, rather than base the decision on the trial judge’s independent and informed judgment. Consequently, I agree with the majority that State v. Wilson…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. Yellow Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.