Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Jacobs

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 1944No. 8588PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is a suit by a grantor’s heirs to set aside, on the ground of the grantor’s mental incapacity, a conveyance of real property to a stranger. Over the objection of the grantee, the heirs were allowed to prove by medical testimony and hospital records that the grantor was insane. The grantee appeals from a judgment in favor of the heirs. The only question we need consider is whether the testimony and records should have been excluded because of a statute which provides that “no physician or surgeon shall be permitted, without the consent of the person afflicted,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sprouse v. MagesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Thompson v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Labofish v. BermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1932
  4. Shornick v. ShornickArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Gorman v. HickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. William J. Emmett, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph N. Emmett v. Eastern Dispensary and Casualty HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Thomas v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. SorrentinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. In Re Estate of WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API