Legal Opinion
Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 20, 2007No. 2006-5039Published
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Michael and Melissa Markovich (collectively the “Markoviches”) appeal from a final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims”). Markovich v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 69 Fed.Cl. 327, 336 (Fed.Cl.2005) (“F inal Decision”). That decision affirmed the Special Master’s report, which denied the petition filed on behalf of the Markoviches’ daughter, Ashlyn M. Markovich (“Ashlyn”), for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“the Vaccine Act”) because it was time-barred. See Markovich v. Sec’y of Health & Human…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Melissa Hines, on Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, Amber Sevier v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Shalala v. WhitecottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Margaret Whitecotton, by Her Next Friends, Kay Whitecotton and Michael Whitecotton v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Joseph Osler Brice and Laurajean Councill Brice, on Behalf of Their Son, Joseph Tilghman Brice v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.