Legal Opinion

Allen v. Shortridge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 22, 1863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

CASE 15 — PETITION EQUITY cited 7 Dana, 92; 5 /. J. M., 762; 5 Mon., 269; 7 B. Mon., 226.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE BULLITT

delivered the opinion oe the court :

In our opinion the court erred in overruling the exception to Davidson’s deposition. But the error was not prejudicial to the appellants, because, even if the slave belonged to Mrs. ShoTtridge, and was not her separate property, the appellants have failed to show a valid conveyance from her and her husband.

The slave of a married woman cannot be sold, except in the mode prescribed for the conveyance of lands of married women. (R. S., ch. 47, art. 2, sec. 2; 17 B. M., 118.) It is the duty of an officer, before certifying an acknowledgment by a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dodd v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laidley v. Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Carpenter v. DummitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API