Legal Opinion

State v. McCool

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2004No. 30142PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

We granted a petition for review in this case to decide whether the district court erred in ordering the defendant to reimburse the cost of drug court counseling as a condition of her probation. We hold that the district court did not err in doing so.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 11, 2001, the appellant Jenifer McCool was arrested for possession of methamphetamine, a felony, as a result of that drug being found in her makeup case during the consensual search of a motor vehicle in which she was a passenger. Because of a syringe and knife also found during that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SearcyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Peltier v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Daniel Ryan StraubIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Abelardo Dominguez GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. Christina Rose WisdomIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. Christopher T. WeaverIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. CalleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API