Legal Opinion

PEREZ-OCEQUEDA v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 2011No. 5D10-4434Published

1Per curiam

The trial court struck Appellant’s facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief “because Defendant failed to assert which portions of the court record support his claims.” This was erroneous and an impermissible shifting of the burden from the court to refute the claims with record attachments.

A defendant need not cite specific portions of the record to support his claim; rather, the burden is on the court to cite those portions of the record that refute the claim. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d). In fact, the defendant’s factual allegations in a rule 3.850 motion must be accepted as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Prince v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API